Finally I turn to whether, in the context I have defined, the words uttered by the defendant constitute contempt of court. The matter must be judged by contemporary Australian standards. It may be offensive, but it is not contempt of court, for a person to describe a judge as a wanker.

Anissa Pty Ltd v Pasons per Justice Cummins, Supreme Court of Victoria [1999]


Jennifer, I expect you to use "wanker" whenever possible in your future court career.